Posts Tagged ‘Global Warming’

Almost every day I read of costly measures being introduced or planned to deal with “toxic” carbon dioxide emissions, for which the taxpayer must carry the burden. The ridiculous thing is that there is still no proof of global warming, for which manmade carbon dioxide is said to be responsible – a natural trace gas that is necessary for life on this planet!

CO2, that we breathe out
And trees and plants can’t do without
Is now a danger to mankind
An enemy to be confined

Still no proof of global warming
Or that CO2’s performing
Any untoward effect
Nothing, therefore, to correct

Pollution properly addressed
Might tax the rich more than the rest
And would involve not just the few
But those exploited by them too.


Read Full Post »

During an election discussion on TV yesterday evening, someone suggested that employers should allow their employees time off to enjoy the 2010 World Cup football matches involving the Dutch team. This received a round of applause from those who were no doubt football-loving employees, but when an employer stood up and commented, ‘Unpaid, of course’ the applause gave way to boos. The politicians sat smiling, obviously enjoying a respite from heated discussions of more important issues.


Read Full Post »

Interesting video from New Zealand’s Professor Robert M Carter, one of the world’s leading palaeoclimatologists.
It can be found here on the site of the Science & Public Policy Institute.
As he says “All scientists are skeptics”.
Theories are dependent on facts and not the other way round.

Read Full Post »

“And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.”


I read in the newspaper today that according to Australian scientists the Earth could become inhabitable for humans by 2030 due to man-made global warming. As if we needed more predictions of doom based on dubiously relevant data and oversimplified models. I’ll make an equally valid forecast: the Earth could become inhabitable for humans by 2030 due to global cooling. But, of course, anything in between is also possible.


Read Full Post »

A poem critical of the motives and science behind global warming

Bend facts to serve the theory
that’s how science works you know.
There’s too much at stake to
heed those who
insist on saying no.

We’ve grants and reputations
to protect from shaking heads
and our lifestyle must be
while wicked slander spreads.


Read Full Post »


The fraud involving the facts supporting the theory of man-made global warming, committed by scientists and politicians to enforce carbon taxes on the world population, is still being perpetuated. Their refusal to instigate an independent inquiry into the affair lends even more support to those who suspect their motives to be purely political and financial.

See this article by Charlie Martin of Pajamas Media


According to secret documents acquired by Fox News, the UN is secretly planning a new “green” world order based on the myth of global warming. The taxpayers of the “richer nations” are going to pay for it to the tune of $45 trillion dollar.
From the Fox News article I quote:

Despite the debacle of the failed Copenhagen climate change conference last December, the United Nations is pressing full speed ahead with a plan for a greatly expanded system of global environmental governance and for a multitrillion-dollar economic transfer scheme to ignite the creation of a “global green economy.“‘

The full article can be read here

Read Full Post »

More revelations in the press concerning man-made global warming:

1.Climategate U-turn as scientist at center of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995, see here

2.Climatology expert threatened for climate change views, see here

3.World may not be warming, say scientists, see here

It’s time for governments to tackle the real issues of pollution, if they dare, instead of playing into the hands of charlatans and scam artists.


A headline from an American online newspaper:

“Still haven’t got your swine flu shot? There’s plenty left”, see here.

More government waste of taxpayers money, not only in America. You won’t hear the pharmaceutical companies complaining though.

Read Full Post »

Earth’s warming is still a hot subject
at least among those who concur
with findings that have proved suspicious
and data that some just prefer. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Updated 31 January 2010

It’s time for responsible scientists and politicians to take a stand against those who are flaunting the principles of science for their own gain.
Even though investigations into the Climategate scandal involving top scientists and government officials are in full swing and new reports of corruption appear in the media almost daily, there are still scientists who forge ahead with outlandish and costly proposals for combating global warming. (more…)

Read Full Post »

The Theater of the Absurd is less than half full.
The presenter of tonight’s show walks onto the stage – a rotund gentleman of uneasy gait.

‘Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to our cold, heartless theater and the new show. We have an impressive group of artists to perform for you tonight, I hope you’ll agree.’ (more…)

Read Full Post »

Update 25th January

1. UK parliamentary investigation into Climategate, see here

2. UN climate panel blunders again over Himalayan glaciers, see here

3. More “blunders” from the UN climate panel, see here


So, it is finally officially recognized that the Mexican Flu pandemic was a storm in a teacup. I read today in the newspaper that the Commission of the European Union (EU) is to hold a hearing to investigate the role played by the pharmaceutical companies involved. (more…)

Read Full Post »

With most of The Netherlands lying below sea level there is much government interest in the prophecies of the climate fortune tellers, especially the one about rising sea levels. The CO2 pollution scam is used almost daily to support any manner of wild schemes designed to save the planet and to introduce crippling carbon taxes. (more…)

Read Full Post »

As reported on 20 December in the UK Telegraph newspaper:

“The head of the UN’s climate change panel – Dr Rajendra Pachauri – is accused of making a fortune from his links with ‘carbon trading’ companies, Christopher Booker and Richard North write.”

Also reported by the same newspaper:

‘Gordon Brown is drawing up plans for the European Union to become a global warming “policeman”, monitoring individual countries’ compliance with carbon-cutting targets.’


So the Copenhagen Conference hasn’t produced the goods, or has it?
Even without an accord over the reduction of CO2 emissions, an agreement to form a regulating body to be paid for by the already heavily burdened taxpayers was forged out by western leaders. To anyone reading between the lines it is becoming clear that the real issue was always the setting up of such a world governing body. As the European President, van Rompuy, publicly stated:
“The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.”
As reported two days ago by The New York Times online in this article:
“The (Copenhagen) accord provides a system for monitoring and reporting (my emphasis – Jan) progress toward those national pollution-reduction goals, a compromise on an issue over which China bargained hard. It calls for hundreds of billions of dollars to flow from wealthy nations to those countries most vulnerable to a changing climate. And it sets a goal of limiting the global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels by 2050, implying deep cuts in climate-altering emissions over the next four decades.”
The system referred to above is an extended bureaucracy of the UN that will be set up to manage the money and govern the flow of it using the IMF and the World Bank.
The important point is that none of these institutions is run by persons unelected by the people. Elected representatives can only offer advice which may be accepted or ignored. Once installed, therefore, this bureaucracy can grow further in importance at the will of unelected rulers.
The hope is that in countries where elected governments still have some control, such as America, Australia, and India, this move towards a dictatorial world government can still be halted.

When global warming is seen as an enemy we should be aware of what Herman Goering, Hitler’s second in command, said when he was standing trial at the Nuremberg Trials for war crimes, “… the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Read Full Post »

Damning revelations are continuing to emerge from the murky waters of the man-made global warming (AGW) issue. See this article.
It’s obviously more about gaining wealth and power than saving the planet – what a surprise. Data and reports are being manipulated by UN backed scientists kowtowing to the politicians and their elite masters. Leading members of the gloom-and-doom brigade, like Gore, are collectively going to make trillions from the selling of carbon credits.
The world wide policing of carbon emissions will heavily penalize taxpayers, already reeling under the blow of the financial collapse.
People, including journalists, seriously protesting in Copenhagen against AGW are being attacked and ridiculed for no good reason.
Isn’t it just awful?
If the world’s leaders today support this disgraceful state of affairs and reach an accord without asking for independent investigation of the issue then that says a lot about their motives.

Read Full Post »

If only I could somehow see
the truth cloaked now in mystery.
If only I could somehow hear
words that could drive away this fear.
If only I could somehow feel
sincerity and know it’s real,
then I could put aside distrust
and accept what they say I must.

Read Full Post »

Can someone tell me what’s going on in Copenhagen? Tony Blair is now saying that the science doesn’t matter. Al Gore is playing down the science, canceling appearances, and trying to start a global green religion. Some including van Rompuy, the President of the European Union, are openly saying that Copenhagen is really about introducing a world government to enforce global taxation on carbon emissions.
No one’s talking about toxic industrial pollution.
It must be clear to nearly everyone that there are doubts about the reliability of model forecasts of climate change even though yesterday I heard a newsreader reporting that 90% of scientists agree that the climate was warming (why not 99% I wonder?). Of course, he couldn’t have said 50% or less because that would have undermined the purpose of the Danish Conference.
It is a fact that many scientists won’t speak out against global warming because they’re frightened of the repercussions, as has been revealed by the recent scandal over leaked documents from the University of East Anglia. The latter has also revealed that data used for climate forecasts has been dubiously manipulated. Why are we supposed to trust scientists who are so obviously  motivated to produce results in agreement with political policies?
Now the Kyoto agreements are reportedly being ignored by the developed nations to the cost of the developing nations that are now being asked to help foot the bill for carbon dioxide pollution. The latter see this as one-sided self-interest.
Another interesting tidbit is that the money raised from carbon taxes – which people like you and I will largely pay – is now going to the IMF and the World Bank instead of the UN. The former two are unelected bodies with no political obligations and effectively under the control of bankers.
If you’re also holding your breath waiting for the results of the Conference then you are at least contributing more to the reduction in carbon emission than the delegates themselves. As an article from Fox News reports:

“The U.N. estimates the 12-day conference will create 40,584 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, roughly the same amount as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006.”

Read Full Post »

Freedom in action

Science in action

In view of the recent revelations concerning the fraudulent behavior of those within the UN’s IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, it would seem prudent to independently re-evaluate the available data and the models used to make climate predictions before implementing drastic financial solutions to possibly non existent problems. However, there is at present no move to do so.
The feverish attempts by leading politicians to reach an accord in Copenhagen regardless of growing doubts about global warming and its relation to CO2 emissions would indicate that there are perhaps other interests at work. Considering the still worsening financial crisis, what could be a reason for still demanding vast amounts of money from developed countries which none have available without increasing the already enormous financial debts for future generations and further pumping up worldwide inflation?
These same politicians are now openly coupling climate change to a world government body, so perhaps the setting up of the latter is the real hidden agenda at the Copenhagen Conference as many are suggesting. This would undoubtedly require an enormous financial investment.
It is also interesting to note that the money raised in the name of reducing CO2 emissions will find its way into the coffers of the IMF and the World Bank, two financial institutions independent of any form of control by elected representatives.
From what one reads one suspects that such a world government would be run on the lines of the new European Union (EU), where non elected forums make all the decisions and elected representatives can at best advance opinions which may be honored or not. Its Central Bank is independent of direct government control and has a monopoly on creating the currency of the EU, which is loaned to its government in the form of legal tender. It is a bank that can lend money to other banks in “times of need”.
So, logic would lead us to assume that a banking cartel will effectively be ruling the world via an unelected world government body. They will get to decide who does what – worldwide. This seems to many to be nothing more than a totalitarian dictatorship. If these suspicions are founded then the world’s population will have more to worry about in the future than climate change.
Of course, a democratically elected world government in control of a world currency would be something different and perhaps what we really need to create a better future for mankind and the environment. But there are doubts as to whether even this could provide a stable democratic system worldwide without becoming oppressive.
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy we read on the subject of World Government the following summary:

“As World government as an ideal expresses an aspiration for law-governed, just and peaceful relations between the diverse groups that comprise a common moral community of humankind. World government as an idea or proposal about how to organize the world politically, however, may or may not meet that ideal. That is, even if there were a world state with authoritative legislative, adjudicative and enforcement powers, the elimination of organized violence, poverty and environmental degradation would not automatically follow. The proponents of global governance face a similar challenge. It remains to be seen whether the developing agents, networks and structures of global governance can effectively promote environmental protection; will be able to develop authoritative mechanisms for disciplining the use of force, by nonstate actors as well as by the world’s most powerful states; and will serve the interests of the bottom half of humanity barely eking out a living, even if it means demanding a small sacrifice from the fortunate fifteen percent of humankind living in the world’s high-income economies.”

It would seem to many that a Federal system of elected government provides the best solution for future society, with free markets and minimal government interference within society. However, the government must be in control of the money supply and there must be a return to currency based some standard such as gold. Of course, such a system cannot remove the element of conflict which will remain a disruptive force in human relations as long as the root of man’s aggression is not addressed.

Further reading:

“Catastrophic Global Warming”, Ecological Brainwashing and World Government
by Olga Chetverikova

Who’s Afraid of World Government?
By Lawrence S. Wittner

Read Full Post »

So the reports from a reliable source at the Copenhagen Climate Conference confirm that its real agenda is to implement a world government to be paid for by you, me and the rest of the hard-working people of the world, not only in cash but in living standards.
Even with the proof of man-made climate change in ruins the elite are still going ahead with their plans regardless. Well, they’ve waited so long for such an opportunity; they’re not going to allow it to fail due to any logical arguments or new insights.
No, the time is ripe to rule the world and there is no more room for doubt and dissent. The Earth is warming because they say so and you, yes you, are guilty as charged for breathing out that poisonous CO2 culprit (a natural gas that plants need and thrive on) and by daring to live in a western society that produces it . And you are going to pay, oh yes you’re going to pay for their world government. They are going to tax you to the hilt. Nearly everything you do is creating CO2, apparently, and you don’t even realize it, you hypocrite :-). The companies you rely on are going to have to pay as well and if they can’t then they will be closed down. Perhaps no more heating, gas or electricity in your house, how’s that for starters?
The elite are even openly discussing the setting up of their own world police force to enforce their undemocratic demands.
People will starve as land for the production of food is taken over for the production of bio-fuels enriching the elite in the process. It’s already happening; people are dying of starvation because of this.
Our trusted leaders are going to vote within ten days to ratify or not this move to enslave humanity, and if they do then they too are guilty as charged of turning their backs on their voters in favor of a megalomaniacal elite, who don’t care about anyone but themselves.
The madmen are not yet rejoicing because things are not going entirely to plan. The leaders of the underdeveloped nations are angry because the financial handouts they were promised are now dependent on their complying with certain conditions which they suspect cannot be met without hardship, especially for them but also for their people.
One can only hope that the growing turmoil in Copenhagen will allow too many truths to escape.

Secretive Copenhagen Treaty Creates Larcenous Global Government Tax

Read Full Post »

I’m sorry to be swinging around my conspiracy cudgel again, but the thought of a world government run by megalomaniacal tycoons and political morons is so dispiriting, so un-Christmassy, so anti mom-dad-and-the-kids, so anti good-morning-neighbor, so Nature-rapingly sinister, so creeping-under-the-bed disquieting, that I feel I have to.
What we have now isn’t much for alien visitors to write home about, I agree, but I’m almost certain that it is a near paradise for we less-rich-and-powerful compared to what they have in mind.
The political ravings of some heads of state are becoming increasingly unsettling to the educated mind and too often reach the heights of sublime disbelief. These obviously worried and distraught leading figures might be carried of in straight-jackets in other circumstances for their mind jerking idiocies and their toad secreting lies. There is a sense of panic that one can almost smell as they are pushed out onto podiums by their masters with such poorly written scripts that they fool no one except fools, charlatans and mouth gaping devotees.
Of course, this is only one way of looking at the present yes-we-can philosophy. My own preference for the no-we-won’t-not-on-those-terms alternative might be construed as a weak attempt to avoid necessary change. “What’s so good about the situation now?” some might say. “World government would eradicate wars and prevent unscrupulous elements messing around with people’s hard earned cash.”
Well it would yes, if such a body could be run with a Santa Claus mentality, but what if it adopted a Scrooge one, which in my humble opinion would be more likely? Would conscience alone be a sufficient correcting influence as in the famous story by Dickens?
Are their signs already as to what might await us?
Well, there is an obvious increase in surveillance and policing, and freedom of speech is being eroded almost day by day. Taxation is on the increase as is the amount of government control over their populations. Western nations are continuing to strengthen their influence over others using force and subterfuge in the name of furthering world democracy and peace, while it is obvious to most that an insatiable thirst for control of natural resources is the real motive.
So greed and oppression would seem to be hot favorites to be the ruling influences of any world authority of the future.
If they eventually are, History will laugh and say, “I told you so.”

Read Full Post »

The ClimateGate scandal is getting out of hand. The UN is to carry out its own investigation of the leaked emails and documents as well as the University of East Anglia, but considering the fact that these two are part of the same organization pushing global warming means that they will both be internal investigations. Considering the seriousness and the global implications for humanity of the man-mad global warming issue, one would expect no less than an independent inquiry (if such a thing is still possible) to finally get at the truth. One can only hope.
The Copenhagen conference on global warming must go through at all costs, it seems, if the plans of the elite for a world government are to proceed. The new President of the European Union, van Rompuy, has confirmed this in his inaugural speech.
The proposed world government would be financed by profits from new “green” industries and taxes raised from the baddies emitting carbon dioxide, including you and me. Well, if you live in a cave somewhere and live off the land you just might escape its clutches.
While they’re at it let the same independent body investigate SwinefluGate – the pandemic that never was which has also cost billions of tax payers hard earned cash, while poisoning them. I could throw in another few “Gates” but I’m sure you can think of a few yourself.
To get to the truth one has but to see the connections – join the dots.
As I wrote in the last post, the European Union’s Government (EG) is now officially a federal entity. Local governments now have even less to say about European affairs with the unelected Council and Commission really running the show. The elected European Parliament has only an advisory roll under the Council as do National Parliaments.
The nitty-gritty of the deal can be found here.
If you have a proposal for the EG then you will have to get one million votes, not all from your own country but spread over at least 15 member states, before your proposal even gets heard. An impossible venture one might say, but enter an organization called the One Million that will help you. All you have to do is obtain 150 supporters for you proposal from at least 15 member states, which is a lot simpler of course :-), and it will do its best to find the rest.

I feel a bit like Scott, a man who is gradually shrinking, in the appropriately titled movie “The Incredible Shrinking Man” (1957):

Clarice: Maybe the best way to begin is to start thinking about the future.
Scott Carey: A future? In a world of giants?
Clarice: Hmm. I’ve lived with them all my life. Oh, Scott, for people like you and me the world can be a wonderful place. The sky is as blue as it is for the giants. The friends are as warm.
Scott Carey: I wish I could believe that.
Clarice: You’ve got to believe that, don’t you?

Clarice is not shrinking, by the way.

The End

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »