I’m amazed that there are still people who do not question after reviewing the evidence the official version of what happened on 9/11. There are facts which are still being officially ignored, for whatever reason, even after so many years. Here are a few.
1. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack – including multiple hijackings, suicide crash-bombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
The multiple military war games planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigation avoid the issue?
2. Building 7 that was not hit by a plane suddenly collapsed within seven seconds. There were only a few fires evident before the collapse and fire fighters were forewarned of its imminent collapse. It is as if it was brought down by demolition charges, a view held by many experts in the field.
At the time of its destruction, it exclusively housed government agencies and financial institutions. It contained offices of the IRS, the US Secret Service and the CIA. One of the most interesting tenants was then-Mayor Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management, and its emergency command center on the 23rd floor. This floor received 15 million dollars worth of renovations, including independent and secure air and water supplies, and bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. How curious that on the day of the attack, Guiliani and his entourage set up shop in a different headquarters, abandoning the special bunker designed precisely for such an event.
3. The similar unexpected rapid collapse of the twin towers also raises the possibility of these also being due to a controlled demolition, whoever organized it.
4. A BBC reporter is seen standing before a background showing life footage of the twin towers area and announcing that building 7 had collapsed twenty minutes before it actually did. In the view behind her the building can still be seen, on fire but still standing.
5. Why was there so much haste to clear away the debris at ground zero before it could be inspected for clues as to what happened and who was responsible?
6. The alleged masterminds of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have been held at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission’s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn’t the government produce these men and put them to trial?
Even though much doubt has been cast on the official story, also by experts in the various relevant disciplines, no new investigation has been forthcoming. This only fuels the conspiracy theories.
Those who dare to raise questions, whoever they are, are just ridiculed and harassed. No attempt is made to enter into a rational discussion. Even the burning questions from the families of those who lost their lives still fall on deaf ears.
Now the US President is saying it shouldn’t be further investigated. Why?
The importance of 9/11 for the present turmoil in the world would seem to justify any means to get at the truth, at least for those who have nothing to hide.
For anyone who’s interested more information can be found here
Leave a comment