Sand sculptures

As I’ve mentioned before, official comments on the ideas of those who don’t accept official explanations are too often limited to personal abuse and/or condescending rhetoric. This morning I read in our local newspaper (government propaganda journal) a report by an official of some UN climate body saying that those who didn’t acknowledge man-made global warming can obtain from him a bucket of sand so they can carry it around and stick their heads in it whenever necessary. He obviously carries around a heavily used one himself; the only difference is that he’s being forced to stick his head into his.
There was another article (yes, the trillionth) by some clot saying that it couldn’t understand why intelligent people in the healthcare business wouldn’t take the swine flu vaccines. The argument is that they are a danger to others and should be ashamed. No, the government should be ashamed for promoting and spreading these largely untested, poisonous concoctions under false pretenses, which while not even guaranteeing prevention, can cause severe disorders themselves. Of course, I have my head in the sand now so you won’t hear this.
It used to be considered beneficial to consider all sides of any argument before making (especially important) decisions but this no longer seems to apply to governments and their advisers. This denial reeks of hidden agendas and cannot fail to fire the imagination of those outsiders who, luckily, can still think intelligently.
My guess is that governments no longer care whether or not their spokesmen appear as cretins, because their plans are proceeding exceedingly well anyway, thank you very much, and there’s not a damned thing we sand people can do about it. Well perhaps not, though some are trying their best.
I want to be President of the European Union. Well, I mean, if Tony Blair is a possible candidate why can’t I be? Do I have your vote? Of course, it probably won’t mean much but it would make a point.